@aradotso/paper2code-arxiv-implementation
Agent skill to convert any arxiv paper into a citation-anchored, working Python implementation with ambiguity auditing
| name | paper2code-arxiv-implementation |
| description | Agent skill to convert any arxiv paper into a citation-anchored, working Python implementation with ambiguity auditing |
| triggers | implement this arxiv paper, turn this paper into code, convert paper to implementation, generate code from arxiv, implement the paper at this URL, reproduce this ML paper, paper2code, create implementation from research paper |
paper2code — Arxiv Paper to Working Implementation
Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
paper2code is a Claude Code agent skill that converts any arxiv paper URL into a citation-anchored Python implementation. Every code decision references the exact paper section and equation it implements, and all gaps/ambiguities are explicitly flagged rather than silently filled in.
Install
npx skills add PrathamLearnsToCode/paper2code/skills/paper2code
During install you'll choose:
- Agents: which coding agents get the skill (e.g., Claude Code)
- Scope: Global (recommended) or project-level
- Method: Symlink (recommended) or copy
Then launch your agent:
claude
Core Commands
Basic usage
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
With framework override
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 --framework jax
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 --framework pytorch # default
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 --framework tensorflow
With mode flag
/paper2code 1706.03762 --mode minimal # architecture only (default)
/paper2code 1706.03762 --mode full # includes training loop + data pipeline
/paper2code 1706.03762 --mode educational # extra comments + pedagogical notebook
Bare arxiv ID (no URL required)
/paper2code 1706.03762
/paper2code 2106.09685
Output Structure
Every run produces a directory named after the paper slug:
attention_is_all_you_need/
├── README.md # Paper summary + quick-start
├── REPRODUCTION_NOTES.md # Ambiguity audit, unspecified choices, known deviations
├── requirements.txt # Pinned dependencies
├── src/
│ ├── model.py # Architecture — every layer cited to paper section
│ ├── loss.py # Loss functions with equation references
│ ├── data.py # Dataset skeleton with preprocessing TODOs
│ ├── train.py # Training loop (full/educational mode)
│ ├── evaluate.py # Metric computation
│ └── utils.py # Shared utilities
├── configs/
│ └── base.yaml # All hyperparams — each cited or flagged [UNSPECIFIED]
└── notebooks/
└── walkthrough.ipynb # Paper section → code → shape checks
Citation Anchoring Convention
The core value of paper2code is traceability. Every non-trivial decision is tagged:
| Tag | Meaning |
|---|---|
§X.Y |
Directly specified in section X.Y |
§X.Y, Eq. N |
Implements equation N from section X.Y |
[UNSPECIFIED] |
Paper doesn't state this — choice made with alternatives listed |
[PARTIALLY_SPECIFIED] |
Paper mentions it but is ambiguous — quote included |
[ASSUMPTION] |
Reasonable inference — reasoning explained |
[FROM_OFFICIAL_CODE] |
Taken from authors' official implementation |
Example — model.py with citation anchors
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import math
class MultiHeadAttention(nn.Module):
"""§3.2 — Multi-Head Attention
Implements Eq. 4: MultiHead(Q, K, V) = Concat(head_1, ..., head_h) W^O
where head_i = Attention(Q W_i^Q, K W_i^K, V W_i^V)
"""
def __init__(self, d_model: int, num_heads: int, dropout: float = 0.1):
super().__init__()
# §3.2 — d_model = 512, h = 8 stated in Table 1
assert d_model % num_heads == 0
self.d_k = d_model // num_heads # §3.2 — d_k = d_v = d_model / h = 64
self.num_heads = num_heads
self.W_q = nn.Linear(d_model, d_model)
self.W_k = nn.Linear(d_model, d_model)
self.W_v = nn.Linear(d_model, d_model)
self.W_o = nn.Linear(d_model, d_model) # §3.2, Eq. 4 — W^O projection
# [UNSPECIFIED] Dropout rate for attention weights not stated in §3.2
# Using 0.1 matching the model-wide dropout (§5.4, Table 3)
self.dropout = nn.Dropout(dropout)
def forward(self, q, k, v, mask=None):
batch_size = q.size(0)
# §3.2, Eq. 4 — project into h heads
Q = self.W_q(q).view(batch_size, -1, self.num_heads, self.d_k).transpose(1, 2)
K = self.W_k(k).view(batch_size, -1, self.num_heads, self.d_k).transpose(1, 2)
V = self.W_v(v).view(batch_size, -1, self.num_heads, self.d_k).transpose(1, 2)
# §3.2.1, Eq. 1 — Attention(Q,K,V) = softmax(QK^T / sqrt(d_k)) V
scores = torch.matmul(Q, K.transpose(-2, -1)) / math.sqrt(self.d_k)
if mask is not None:
# §3.2.3 — decoder masks future positions with -inf before softmax
scores = scores.masked_fill(mask == 0, float('-inf'))
attn_weights = torch.softmax(scores, dim=-1)
attn_weights = self.dropout(attn_weights)
out = torch.matmul(attn_weights, V) # (batch, heads, seq, d_k)
out = out.transpose(1, 2).contiguous().view(batch_size, -1, self.num_heads * self.d_k)
return self.W_o(out) # §3.2, Eq. 4 — W^O output projection
class TransformerBlock(nn.Module):
"""§3.1 — Encoder/Decoder layer structure"""
def __init__(self, d_model: int, num_heads: int, d_ff: int, dropout: float = 0.1):
super().__init__()
self.attention = MultiHeadAttention(d_model, num_heads, dropout)
# [ASSUMPTION] Using pre-norm based on stability; paper Figure 1 shows post-norm
# Post-norm: x = LayerNorm(x + sublayer(x)) — §3.1
# [PARTIALLY_SPECIFIED] "We apply layer normalization" — position ambiguous
self.norm1 = nn.LayerNorm(d_model)
self.norm2 = nn.LayerNorm(d_model)
# §3.3 — FFN(x) = max(0, xW_1 + b_1)W_2 + b_2
self.ff = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(d_model, d_ff),
nn.ReLU(), # §3.3 — "ReLU activation"
nn.Dropout(dropout),
nn.Linear(d_ff, d_model),
)
self.dropout = nn.Dropout(dropout)
def forward(self, x, mask=None):
# §3.1 — residual connection around each sub-layer
attn_out = self.attention(self.norm1(x), self.norm1(x), self.norm1(x), mask)
x = x + self.dropout(attn_out)
x = x + self.dropout(self.ff(self.norm2(x)))
return x
Example — configs/base.yaml with citations
# base.yaml — All hyperparameters for attention_is_all_you_need
# Each value is either cited from the paper or flagged [UNSPECIFIED]
model:
d_model: 512 # §3, Table 1 — "d_model = 512"
num_heads: 8 # §3.2, Table 1 — "h = 8"
d_ff: 2048 # §3.3, Table 1 — "d_ff = 2048"
num_encoder_layers: 6 # §3, Table 1 — "N = 6"
num_decoder_layers: 6 # §3, Table 1 — "N = 6"
dropout: 0.1 # §5.4, Table 3 — "P_drop = 0.1"
max_seq_len: 512 # [UNSPECIFIED] not stated; using 512 (common default)
# Alternatives: 256, 1024
training:
batch_size: 25000 # §5.1 — "each batch ~25,000 source + target tokens"
optimizer: adam # §5.3 — "Adam optimizer"
beta1: 0.9 # §5.3 — "β1 = 0.9"
beta2: 0.98 # §5.3 — "β2 = 0.98"
epsilon: 1.0e-9 # §5.3 — "ε = 10^-9"
warmup_steps: 4000 # §5.3 — "warmup_steps = 4000"
label_smoothing: 0.1 # §5.4 — "ε_ls = 0.1"
Example — REPRODUCTION_NOTES.md structure
# Reproduction Notes — Attention Is All You Need
## Ambiguity Audit
### SPECIFIED (high confidence)
| Choice | Value | Source |
|--------|-------|--------|
| d_model | 512 | §3, Table 1 |
| num_heads | 8 | §3.2, Table 1 |
| optimizer | Adam β1=0.9, β2=0.98 | §5.3 |
### PARTIALLY_SPECIFIED (judgment call made)
| Choice | Our Decision | Paper Quote | Alternatives |
|--------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
| Norm position | pre-norm | "layer norm before each sub-layer" (§3.1) conflicts with Figure 1 | post-norm |
### UNSPECIFIED (our defaults)
| Choice | Our Default | Rationale | Alternatives |
|--------|-------------|-----------|--------------|
| LayerNorm epsilon | 1e-6 | common default | 1e-5, 1e-8 |
| max_seq_len | 512 | common for WMT | 256, 1024 |
## Known Deviations
- data.py provides skeleton only; WMT14 preprocessing not implemented
- No beam search decoding (§5 mentions beam size 4, not fully implemented)
What paper2code Will NOT Do
Understanding limits prevents wasted debugging time:
- Won't guarantee correctness — matches what the paper describes; if the paper is wrong, the code is wrong
- Won't invent details silently — gaps are always
[UNSPECIFIED], never filled confidently - Won't download datasets —
data.pygives aDatasetskeleton with instructions - Won't set up training infrastructure — no distributed training, no experiment tracking
- Won't implement baselines — only the paper's core contribution
- Won't reimplement standard components — imports them or notes the dependency
Common Patterns
Pattern 1 — Implement a new architecture paper
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929 --mode minimal
Focus: src/model.py will contain the full architecture. Review REPRODUCTION_NOTES.md to understand every ambiguous choice before running.
Pattern 2 — Reproduce a training method
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 --mode full --framework pytorch
Focus: src/train.py will contain the full training loop. configs/base.yaml will list every hyperparameter with paper citations.
Pattern 3 — Educational deep-dive
/paper2code 1706.03762 --mode educational
Focus: notebooks/walkthrough.ipynb walks through each paper section, shows corresponding code, and runs CPU-safe shape checks.
Pattern 4 — Quick architecture prototype
/paper2code 2106.09685 # ViT
Then inspect and run:
cd vision_transformer/
pip install -r requirements.txt
python -c "
from src.model import VisionTransformer
import torch
model = VisionTransformer() # toy config
x = torch.randn(2, 3, 224, 224)
print(model(x).shape)
"
Troubleshooting
Skill not triggering
- Confirm install completed:
npx skills listshould showpaper2code-arxiv-implementation - Use the explicit trigger:
/paper2code <url> - Try bare arxiv ID format:
/paper2code 1706.03762
Generated code has import errors
- Run
pip install -r requirements.txtfirst - Check
REPRODUCTION_NOTES.mdfor noted dependencies - Standard components (e.g., HuggingFace transformers) are imported, not reimplemented — install them separately
"Paper not found" or fetch errors
- Confirm the arxiv ID exists:
https://arxiv.org/abs/<ID> - Try the full URL instead of bare ID
- Some very new papers (hours old) may not be indexed yet
Silent assumptions in generated code
- This should not happen by design — if you find one, it's a bug
- Check
REPRODUCTION_NOTES.mdfirst; the assumption may be documented there - Report via the repo issues if a gap was genuinely filled silently
Framework-specific issues
- Default framework is PyTorch — omitting
--frameworkgives PyTorch output - JAX output requires
jax,flax,optax— listed inrequirements.txt - TensorFlow output requires
tensorflow>=2.x
Contributing
Add a worked example
- Run:
/paper2code https://arxiv.org/abs/XXXX.XXXXX - Save output to
skills/paper2code/worked/{paper_slug}/ - Write
review.mdevaluating correctness, flagged ambiguities, and any mistakes - Submit PR
Improve guardrails
Add patterns where the skill makes silent assumptions to guardrails/.
Add domain knowledge
Papers in your subfield reference common components? Add a knowledge file to knowledge/ (e.g., knowledge/graph_neural_networks.md).
Resources
- Repo: https://github.com/PrathamLearnsToCode/paper2code
- Worked examples:
skills/paper2code/worked/in the repo - Issues: https://github.com/PrathamLearnsToCode/paper2code/issues
- License: MIT
Loading...
Select a file to preview
Analyzing security...
Checking scan reports and verification data.
Bill of Materials
Everything this skill can do — files, network, commands, and more.