@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment

Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.

View in AI SkillSafe app
1 scan finding
0 downloads
0 stars
0 demos
SKILL.md
namenovelty-assessment
descriptionAssess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.
argument-hint[idea]

Novelty Assessment

Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.

Input

  • $0 — Research idea description, title, or JSON file

Scripts

Automated novelty check

python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
  --idea "Your research idea description" \
  --max-rounds 10 --output novelty_report.json

Literature search

python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py \
  --query "relevant search query" --max-results 10

References

  • Assessment prompts and criteria: ~/.claude/skills/novelty-assessment/references/assessment-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Idea

  • Identify the core contribution
  • List the key technical components
  • Determine the research area and subfield

Step 2: Multi-Round Literature Search (up to 10 rounds)

For each round:

  1. Generate a targeted search query
  2. Search Semantic Scholar / arXiv / OpenAlex
  3. Review top-10 results with abstracts
  4. Assess overlap with the idea
  5. Decide: need more searching, or ready to decide

Step 3: Make Decision

  • Novel: After sufficient searching, no paper significantly overlaps
  • Not Novel: Found a paper that significantly overlaps

Step 4: Position the Idea

If novel, identify:

  • Most similar existing papers (for Related Work)
  • How the idea differs from each
  • The specific gap this idea fills

Harsh Critic Persona

Be a harsh critic for novelty. Ensure there is a sufficient contribution
for a new conference or workshop paper. A trivial extension of existing
work is NOT novel. The idea must offer a meaningfully different approach,
formulation, or insight.

Output Format

{
  "decision": "novel" | "not_novel",
  "confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
  "justification": "After searching X rounds...",
  "most_similar_papers": [
    {"title": "...", "year": 2024, "overlap": "..."}
  ],
  "differentiation": "Our idea differs because..."
}

Rules

  • Minimum 3 search rounds before declaring novel
  • Try to recall exact paper names for targeted queries
  • A paper idea is NOT novel if it's a trivial extension
  • Consider both methodology novelty AND application novelty
  • Check for concurrent/recent arXiv submissions

Related Skills

Embed badges

Add these to your README to show the skill's verification status.

SkillSafe verified badge
Verified badge
[![SkillSafe verified badge](https://api.skillsafe.ai/v1/badge/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/verified)](https://skillsafe.ai/skill/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/)
Installs badge
Installs badge
[![Installs badge](https://api.skillsafe.ai/v1/badge/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/installs)](https://skillsafe.ai/skill/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/)
Scan badge
Scan badge
[![Scan badge](https://api.skillsafe.ai/v1/badge/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/scan)](https://skillsafe.ai/skill/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/)
Eval pass rate badge
Eval pass rate
[![Eval pass rate badge](https://api.skillsafe.ai/v1/badge/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/eval)](https://skillsafe.ai/skill/@lingzhi227/novelty-assessment/)