@mikubaka88/ccf-submission-checker
@mikubaka88/ccf-submission-checker — AI coding skill
| name | ccf-submission-checker |
| description | Check CCF venue rules and submission packages: template, pages, anonymity, PDF build, metadata, and reproducibility. Use for 投稿检查, 会议格式, page limits, and artifact readiness. Verify current official rules for the exact venue/year/track. Manuscript polishing belongs to ccf-paper-writer. |
CCF Submission Checker
Core Rule
Treat submission as a build, venue-policy, page-budget, and artifact-readiness gate. Use local venue guides for expected rules, then require official-policy freshness for final decisions. Do not rewrite paper content.
Modes
venue-format: template, page limit, anonymity, author block, supplementary and camera-ready rules.package-check: LaTeX/PDF build, metadata, fonts, page count, file structure, and submission checklist.artifact: code/data/model release plan, environment, seeds, hardware, licenses, artifact README, and reproducibility appendix.full: venue + package + artifact.
Workflow
- Identify venue/year/track, submission mode, project directory, TeX/PDF files, supplementary/artifact files, and deadline pressure.
- Read
ccfa.yamlwhen available. If absent, proceed with supplied files and state that project-state tracking is unavailable. - For venue questions, read
../ccf-paper-writer/references/venue-guides/index.mdand the specific venue guide before checking official freshness. - For package checks, inspect the actual TeX/PDF/build output, page accounting for the exact venue/year/track, anonymity, fonts, metadata, references, and applicable required forms. Read logs and affected pages; do not infer a successful build from file presence.
- For artifact checks, build a reproducibility checklist: code, data, models, environment, seeds, hardware, license, access restrictions, and README.
- Hand off to
ccf-paper-writerfor text/page rewrites: compression when over limit, substantive expansion when actual explanation is missing, and normal polishing when within budget. Hand off toccf-experiment-designerfor missing reproducibility experiments,ccf-visual-composerfor figure/table float order, caption placement, font, clipping, palette, or visual readability fixes, andccf-rebuttal-writerfor post-review response packaging.
Output Contract
Mode:
Venue and rule freshness:
Files checked:
Pass/fail checklist:
Build/package issues:
Anonymity/page/font/metadata issues:
Length budget status:
Artifact/reproducibility issues:
Required fixes:
Next CCFA owner:
Check Scope
Follow ../ccf-common/references/handoff-modes.md and ../ccf-common/references/task-modes.md. Run checks relevant to the requested mode and actual artifacts. Distinguish pass, fail, not applicable, and not verified; missing tools do not imply passing or failure. Record the official rule URL and the date checked. Reuse the project build configuration and place generated logs/previews in the established or shared task build directory. Update the canonical readiness report in place and distinguish old PDFs from successful current builds. Recheck only affected build surfaces after a fix. Underfilling a page budget alone is not a venue violation. Do not upload or submit files merely because a readiness check was requested.
For file outputs, follow ../ccf-common/references/artifact-contracts.md: resolve existing project paths first, keep generated working files under one stable task/artifact directory, and update canonical files in place. Load this shared policy only when files are written and it is not already in context.
Loading...
Select a file to preview
Analyzing security...
Checking scan reports and verification data.
Bill of Materials
Everything this skill can do — files, network, commands, and more.